Some of you probably don’t know this but I used to live in Hobart, Tasmania many years ago.
After losing interest in the rat race that was Melbourne, I decided to move to Tasmania so that I could attend the University of Tasmania in the relative peace that is Hobart and get a degree.
I had never been to Tassie before then, but like many Australians I had a quaint, somewhat idealistic notion of the place.
I thought that Tassie was a little behind modern times and was a pleasant throw back to a more sedate time in our society.
A place where people genuinely spoke to others in the street, where you knew your next door neighbours well, and you could comfortably have a chat to a stranger in the front bar of the pub without the raise of an slightly suspicious, questioning eyebrow.
All in all, things were generally a little more pleasant down in Tassie and I must say that thankfully, all of these things were true about Tassie.
Tassie is a lovely place, populated by a great number of humble, affable people that welcomed me with open arms, as well as being a place of unique environmental beauty.
But it wasn’t until I had worked for the Tasmanian State Government in Economic Development that I started to take notice of the politics of Tasmania and how very different things were in Tassie to the rest of Australia.
Tasmania, like several mainland states, was a die hard Labor state when I was arrived in 1998 and not much has changed in the years since I left.
The Labor party has been in government for over 14 years now and it has overseen Tasmania’s inexorable march to economic decline, a path that is well worn by socialist governments not only here in Australia but around the world.
A mate from Hobart that I used to play footy with summed up the situation recently with a post on Facebook that I felt outlined the situation in Tasmania very well. So well in fact that I contacted him to see if I could reproduce it here for you all. Thankfully he was very receptive to the idea 🙂
With that in mind, I present to you the inaugural guest post by my mate Trapper on Dacka’s Razor, hopefully the first of many such posts looking at the finer points of living in Tasmania from a local’s perspective.
I hope you like it – Dacka
——————————-
Is Tasmania a political wasteland? – Guest post by Tassie Trapper
All other Australian states want economic development, especially Queensland and Western Australia, where they relentlessly pursue it.
These action orientated states deeply resent the stifling regulations that they perceive as being instigated from a remote and paternalistic national capital, administered by people who have no real idea of local needs or constraints.
In short, states such as WA and QLD go for it, as far and as fast as they can – and it pays off. Tasmania however is very different.
Any sort of proposal for almost any degree of change or development is almost always met with loud and instant opposition.
Overnight a committee springs up, and interest groups with no skin in the game essentially make decisions on behalf of all Tasmanians that will stymie development and virtually stall projects forever.
Of course, no-one would argue for a Rafferty’s rules type situation here in Tasmania – our island is far too special to allow that.
However, it is time we all acknowledged the elephant in the room and Tasmania’s economic elephant is called structural dysfunction.
Mainland states are becoming increasingly resentful of Tasmania’s continual expectation of increases in GST funding to support our comfortable lifestyles, as they see it, at their expense. WA Premier Colin Barnett recently railed against the anti-development nature of Tasmania.
If they (Tasmanians) continue to reject any sort of development, well, what right is there to simply take the spoils of hard work in other states? – Colin Barnett
Objectively, you can see their point.
For every dollar raised in GST in the west, Western Australia only receives .71 cents in the dollar back from the Federal government.
Tasmania, on the other hand, receives $1.60 from the Federal government for every dollar raised in GST.
As the inequitable distribution shows, the only real thing Tasmania possesses is a serious lack of self-sufficiency. Tasmania has become so reliant on handouts from the mainland that federal taxpayers prop up almost 70% of the Tasmanian budget.
In its simplest terms, one-third of Tasmania’s workforce is in the public service, one-third is on social welfare, the other third is in private enterprise.
Tasmania has more public servants per head of population than any other state – one for every 16 people, as against one for every 21 in Victoria for example.
The Tasmanian public sector has even outstripped the growth seen in Canberra, with increases of almost 34% in the past 10 years.
One financial analyst has calculated that the public sector wages bill has risen from $1.32 billion in 2003-04 to $2.23 billion in the last financial year alone.
These levels of imbalance are simply unsustainable.
The response to this structural dysfunction has been to snip around the edges of the problem; take some mobile phones away from police officers, threaten small schools with closure, trim the health budget, and shy away from reunifying the three electricity authorities to achieve/restore economies of scale.
Difficult as it may be to accept, none of these things will address the real problem. This is the modern equivalent of fiddling while Rome burns. If we are to move beyond this unsustainable structure, we need to totally rebuild our economic model – and that means growing our state’s income, as well as reining in costs.
Late last year, former Labor minister Julian Amos interviewed 60 Tasmanian CEOs, union leaders, heads of peak industry bodies, economists, heads of government agencies and political commentators and came up with a damning assessment of the state’s economy.
On the front page of the report, Dr Amos said
Tasmania is wallowing in the comfort of mediocrity, a mendicant state, fast becoming an aged care facility in a national park.
The Labor government has no clear direction for the ailing economy of this state or its long term future. The Labor Government has had long enough to prove itself as a erudite and visionary party.
While it’s clearly time for change, I agree with the notion that there will be no overnight fix for the economic wilderness that Tasmania currently finds itself in.
Labor have been in power since 1998 when the late Jim Bacon was elected into power after his home state of Victoria had basically sent him into exile as they had no confidence in his ability.
Bacon then set about creating a union paradise by enticing his old union mates such as John Halfpenny and company down to the Apple Isle to live a life of power and almost dictatorship.
The arrangement was rolled gold for some, almost to the extent of insider trading, but as with all things, the good times must come to an end and they have well and truly ended for Labor in Tasmania.
Since Bacon’s untimely death from cancer in 2004, there has been a string of Labor leaders fill the rotating post of Premier of Tasmania. All of these momentary leaders eventually lost the confidence of not only the Tasmanian populous but also from the rest of our nation.
Constant scandal has surrounded the various leaders of the Labor party in Tasmania and the current Premier is only there by proxy.
Lara Giddiness, sorry Giddings, (sometimes predictive text has a habit of suggestive ironic alternatives!) has no real thrust to her political vision, nor does she possess the ruthless nature to create the vastly different political landscape that Tasmania needs to ensure a prosperous future.
In essence, Giddings has no credibility here in Tasmania let alone on the Big Island that our mainland cousins call Australia.
Lara, please stop with the outstretched hands; Develop a real economic plan and stop relying on assistance from the Big Island to underwrite our state.
The Liberal party doesn’t have all the answers to our problems and as we all know from the proverb Rome wasn’t built in a day but after 14 long years of no real long term economic vision, inept political bungling and blatant featherbedding, surely the time for the winds of change to sweep over the Tasmanian political plains is now.
I don’t disagree that the figures show the Tasmanian economy is one of the worst performing, and has been held back by a lack of enthusiasm for change. But I wonder if that pleasant sense of quaint community would be present had Tasmania hurtled into neo-liberal economic reforms, given the tendency of such reforms to fragment communities. Tasmania needs change, for the good of its own people. But part of what makes it special is its unique environment and culture, so any change ought to be sensitive to this. Sacking public servants alone is not the answer (not that I take that as the sole suggestion of the article.) Regardless, a thought provoking and well written piece.
Hey Rambler,
Firstly, neo-liberalism advocates support economic liberalisation, free trade and open markets, privatisation, deregulation, and decreasing the size of the public sector while increasing the role of the private sector in modern society. Amongst these ideals the only one I can see any issue with is privatisation and even that is debatable in certain situations. Not sure how you can attribute any of these ideals to the fracturing of communities with such a blanket, throw away line.
The development of the welfare state directly led to the downfall of many community associations in the early 20th century. Before then, genuine altruism was the norm in society, not some isolated act of random kindness on YouTube. People looked after each other via benevolent societies. Now people look to the government to provide all types of support that they could be providing themselves or others in the communities, either through the form of low level barter economics or via more traditional modes of business. Governments activity in any sector crowds out private endeavour.
So by extension, I would argue that Big Government is what fractures communities, not liberalism.
There was no mention of sacking public servants per se, only the reflection that the Tasmanian PS has grown by 34% and directly employs 1/3 of the population. This is clearly unsustainable in the long term and must be rectified, otherwise it will fail eventually like a kind of ponzi scheme.
Any sector that grows at 34% while the rest of that economy goes backwards is indicative of the general over emphasis on having government provide for us in every possible situation.
Aside from this, the impact that this level of PS employment has on the local job market is dire and one of the reasons that I left Tassie. There is no churn in Tassie, ergo there is limited opportunity to get a role, there is extremely limited opportunity full stop. This is mainly due to the Peter Principle, which sees people rise only to the level of their own incompetency. This is not inherently a bad thing, it just recognises that each of us has a ceiling in terms of competence.
But as people get more experienced in the PS they invariably move up the ladder. Some slowly, others quickly. But once in the PS you CANNOT be demoted and it is almost impossible to get sacked. So there becomes a bottle neck, choked at the top. There is only natural attrition. Sometimes a role would only become available when someone retired or moved state. Given the above average salaries that senior PS command, living in Hobart can be quite comfortable. Until recently housing prices in Tasmania were a fraction of the cost on the mainland.
Another 1/3 of the population is wholly dependent on social security. This is mainly due to the lack of employment opportunities, which reflects a general lack of business diversity, which is driven largely by a lack of private investment, which is due to a very vocal minority aggressively pushing their narrow agenda. It is a series of dominoes that is intimately intertwined and related.
I totally agree that Tassie has a unique natural environment. But 78% of Tasmania’s forest have already been reserved (see: http://www.environment.gov.au/land/forests/pubs/tas-forest-agreement-reserves-map.pdf) I used to hike into the NW Wilderness Area, so trust me when I say that the amount reserved is plenty. There are sections of Tasmania that have NOTHING but wilderness for as far as the eye can see. The amount of population on the island is a true micro version of the Australian mainland in that there is a smattering along the costal areas and bugger all else.
While the amazing environment is no doubt important, the problem is that eco-tourism is not the panacea for Tasmania’s economic ills. There have been many proposals that take into consideration the environmental impact but these have been junked mainly because of extremely vocal opposition from environmentalists. What these activists fail to account for is the human impact of their environmentally based ideology. The purchase and closure of the Triabunna saw mill by Graeme Wood and Jan Cameron saw the demise of a historic settlement town. Eco-tourism did not and could not save Triabunna.
Interestingly, Cameron who owns the Tasmanian retail chain Chickenfeed didn’t quite like the same boycott tactics that she employed on the mill being employed against the very store that gave her the millions of dollars that enable her to push her personal ideology onto a whole township.
The quaintness that I described has nothing to do with the political leanings of people, but rather their character. The culture of Tasmania has more to do with it’s convict roots than anything else. That and the battle against nature to just survive in what can be quite inhospitable locales. If you have ever been on Macquarie Harbour in a storm then you will know what I mean.
But generally speaking, I agree that Tassie Trapper has put together a well written piece. There will be more coming from our new Tassie correspondent in the near future, so keep an eye out.
Oh, also… if you want an excellent eye into the development of the Tasmanian psyche and culture that stems from the earliest years of first settlement, I would recommend you give Death of a River Guide by Martin Flanagan a read.
Quite possibly one of my favourite reads ever. BIG call I know, as I have read MANY books in my life, but reading that book whilst I was living in Hobart, trekking in the NW bush was a fascinating experience.
No surprise that it was shortlisted for the Miles Franklin award many years ago.